Wednesday, May 22, 2013

 

English language instruction in public schools: A good idea


The following opinion piece was published in Republica today, 22 May 2013, with the title "English Vinglish".

English language instruction in public schools: A good idea

My father teaches in Pokhariya Higher Secondary School, one of the many public schools in Biratnagar. Beginning this academic session, the school is planning to have separate sections in which all subjects, except Nepali of course, will be instructed in English. Those who wish to be instructed in English are being encouraged to join, with additional fees charged for the luxury. This novel approach is being tried out not only in Pokhariya but in many government-run public schools across the country.

The obvious question, then, is whether this is necessary. Government run public schools have always used Nepali language as the medium of instruction. Is instruction in English going to change anything, for better or worse? Will learning everything in English improve the grades of public school students? Or is this only a fad that will fizzle out over the next few years? There are questions aplenty, but no precedent to fall back on for answers. I do not know what the result of this experimentation is going to be. However, I believe this is an excellent idea that will revolutionize our education system.

Many of us still remember how the world panicked over Y2K crisis as the year 2000 approached. In order to avert the crisis, all computer programs in the world would have to be fixed to make sure important financial and economic software installed in those computers did not go haywire once the year 2000 started. So, the world needed computer engineers and programmers on a massive scale. Both China and India had those in large numbers, but most companies and businesses in the world used Indian computer firms and engineers to get their problems fixed. Was that because Chinese software engineers and programmers were less adept? No. The world came to India because Indian engineers had an advantage over Chinese engineers: English language, in which the Indians were fluent and the Chinese were not.

We sit between those two economic powerhouses—China and India. By 2020, around 40 percent Chinese are expected to be in the middle-class, and over 700 million have been lifted out of poverty so far. India still has some way to go to attain the level of growth that China has experienced. But it has also grown spectacularly since liberalizing its economy in the 1990s. Millions have been lifted out of poverty, and India’s middle-class today boasts a population larger than the entire population of the United States.

China has grown on the basis of its manufacturing prowess because of an abundance of cheap labor and great economic leadership of its rulers, especially that of Deng Xiaoping. However, the history of previous economic powerhouses of North America and Europe shows us that manufacturing growth does not last long. In order to create a sustainable economy that keeps growing, it is important to make sure that the workforce transforms itself from low-skilled to high-skilled. That looks more likely in India than in China. India’s economic growth has been led by high-skilled sectors like IT and R&D. A workforce with good English skills has meant that demand for high-skilled work has kept coming to India.

It would be naïve to imagine Nepal growing as fast and as far as India if we can somehow become more fluent in English. That is not my contention. However, the world has become smaller with the workforce of today not constrained within a nation’s boundaries. We need not look far. Hundreds of thousands of Nepalis leave each year to work overseas. We have migrated to work in Dubai, Qatar, Malaysia, Japan, Korea, India and many other countries. None of these countries speak the same language, but most understand English.

However, most Nepalis who go to work in these countries know neither English nor the local language of the host country. This creates problems for Nepali workers ranging from something as harmless as miscommunication to as serious as outright exploitation. A lot of the problems that Nepali workers face overseas could be reduced if we knew English. We need to realize that English is not just another language we can learn, but an important tool that can empower Nepali workers in the global job market.

Because of their British legacy, and because their natives speak thousands of languages, Indians have resorted to English as a means of communication even among themselves. This knowledge of English language has helped Indian workers go everywhere, from North America to Europe to Africa, and succeed as laborers or businesspeople. Other countries such as Poland and Ireland, where a significant population has command over English, have been able to grow not only because of their own domestic economic demand but also because of outsourcing of jobs and demand from other English speaking countries. Even in Nepal, most students from English-medium schools find better opportunities, whether in going abroad for studies or in getting a job within Nepal. English is no longer a language but a required ‘qualification’ in getting good jobs in today’s Nepal.

The experiment that has started in public schools is in the best interest of the country. I do not believe that instructions in English will make students any smarter than if they are instructed in Nepali language. However, English is a dominant language spoken and understood in almost every country in the world. Nepali workers of today have been competing in the world marketplace for jobs. English language instruction in all our schools—public and private—is a worthy cause because being able to read, write and speak English has become a very important skill that a ‘global worker’ of today and the future needs to possess.

Labels: , , ,


Monday, April 9, 2012

 

Evolution of languages


I had an article published yesterday in The Kathmandu Post on the evolution of languages. The direct link to Kathmandu Post article is here with the edited title "Evolving everyday".


Evolution of a language

Last week, I was in Boudha, in a clothing store. Two girls entered the shop, and started checking out discounted jackets while talking to each other. I kept looking in their direction with fascination. These girls were talking in a mix of Nepali-English-Tibetan with occasional Hindi thrown in while talking to the Madhesi shopkeeper. Only in a multi-ethnic, multi-lingual country like Nepal would scenes like that even be possible.

Purists hate it when people mix languages to create something new. English language scholars in the United Kingdom keep fuming over Hinglish that has been introduced by immigrants from South Asia. For these critics, the worst news is that the other segment of the population seems to have embraced Hinglish easily. The BBC has reported that badmash and timepass have replaced their English counterparts in everyday speech in the UK these days. Non-South Asian children in the UK have started using the word katti to their friends with a thumb on their chins, indicating that they’re no longer friends. “Isn’t it?” has simply been replaced with “no?” in the typical South Asian way. 

While English language puritans in the UK are irritated due to the rise of Hinglish, they need not worry about the demise of their traditional language. Since English is spoken by a huge proportion of the people in this planet, traditional English will survive another thousand years. However, it is not the same with German. According to German language puritans, the language mixing phenomenon has endangered the survival of the German language.

The Economist has reported the rise of a new urban language, Kiezdeutsch, has irritated German language purists. It fuses German, English, Turkish, Arabic and other languages to create a melting pot of languages. To understand it, one would have to live in Germany’s multi-lingual urban communities. German kids these days use words like musstu (mix of English words “must” and “you”), lan (Turkish word for “dude”), and yalla (Arabic for “come on”) that has the puritans in fits. 

I remember myself, during my high-school days, noticing that for those of us who came from outside the valley, it was strange to see our classmates from the valley use so many English words in a Nepali sentence. Conversely, our classmates from the valley felt that those from western Nepal talked too politely, and those from eastern Nepal talked too flamboyantly. They could not understand why those from Biratnagar frequently used made-up words like aanch (meaning “wow”) and not-so-made-up phrases like baal chhaina (meaning “don’t care”) in our sentences.

I think what the purists forget in the language discussions is the fact that the world today is a lot different than the one where they grew up. It is one thing to reminisce the language they learnt and another to be practical about the evolution of language. They should realize that the English they call “traditional” is actually radically different from the English used by, say, William Shakespeare. 

When Shakespeare was churning out literary classics, he was also churning out “made-up” words—words that did not exist at that time and place. Today, we cannot imagine an English language without Shakespeare-invented words like assassinate, luggage, blanket, dawn, arouse, cake, champion, and many others. English language purists during Shakespeare’s time would have grinded a lot of gears hating Shakespeare for inventing new words. Oh, and just in case the critics today do not know, the word “critic” itself was invented by Shakespeare.

Language is like a landscape. Passage of time through history constantly changes it. It constantly evolves. There are hundreds of words in English that have become extinct because they are no longer relevant or have been replaced by easier and better words. Similarly, the English language, in its true global nature, keeps embracing new and better words from other languages. Words like guru and pundit have been borrowed from Sanskrit (the oldest living language), and popularized by English (the most dynamic and evolving language).

Therefore, critics of Hinglish or Kiezdeutsch need not worry. English and German languages are evolving according to time just like all other languages around the world, including our very own Nepali language. The real reason to worry would have been if these languages were not constantly evolving.

We should realize that all languages were “invented” by different groups of people living in different parts of the world. They were invented as means of communication, and there is no doubt that they have proven to be effective means through the ages. So, when language puritans argue about preservation, they argue as if the languages in their current form are the “end” result. They’re not. Languages are still a “means” to communicate, and not the “end” of communication. Therefore, by their very nature, they need to evolve through time.

Bringing this matter closer to home, there is an ongoing debate in Nepal today regarding preservation of ethnic languages. The Rai community wants to preserve their language, but cannot decide which version to preserve. There are at least a dozen different dialects of the “Rai language”. I have a Rai colleague whose parents are both Rai. However, they speak different dialects of the same Rai language. As a result, they resort to talking in Nepali to understand one another. The same is true of Nepali, as well. Nepali spoken in the far-west is much different than that spoken in the east and center.

Since “communication” is the main purpose of a language, if a language that is better at communicating evolves, it replaces the older languages. We have seen that happen in South Asia where Sanskrit is on the verge of being extinct as a spoken language. Our languages served us well when we were living as isolated tribes. But, the world has grown smaller now. Therefore, just like in biological evolution, only the strongest and the fittest will survive. Sadly, this means that languages spoken by huge majorities will survive, leaving thousands of beautiful languages spoken by smaller minorities around the world to become extinct.  

Labels: , , , , ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]